ARTHUR E. DONEGAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Cont'l NAT. Bank v. Nat'l City Bank of N.Y., 69 F.2d 312 (9th Cir. 1934)
  …y and commercial use of letters of credit. Lamborn v. National Bank of Commerce, 276 U. S. 469, 48 S. Ct. 378, 379, 72 L. Ed. 657 (1928) and Old Colony Trust Co. v. Lawyers’ Title & Trust Co., 297 P. 152, 153 (C. C. A. 2d, 1924), certiorari denied 265 U. S. 585, 44 S. Ct. 459, 68 L. Ed. 1192, are distinguishable on the facts. In the former case, the letter was drawn against a shipment of sugar from Java to Philadelphia, and required an “ocean bill of lading covering shipment Java to Philadelphia.” The ship…
• Voest-Alpine Int'l Corp. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 707 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …credit are designed to serve in general, but also the entire transaction at hand in particular. Falsified documents are the same as no documents at all. See Old Colony Trust Co. v. Lawyers’ Title & Trust Co., 297 F. 152, 158 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 265 U.S. 585, 44 S.Ct. 459, 68 L.Ed. 1192 (1924); Prutscher v. Fidelity International Bank, 502 F.Supp. 535 (S.D.N.Y.1980). We are not persuaded upon the present record, as was the trial court, that Voest did not intend to deceive Chase when it submitted deliber…
• Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc., 147 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1944)
  …estinghouse case is applicable to the questions of proof presented in the instant case.9,10We find support for this view in many of the decisions. In Armstrong v. Belding Bros. & Co., D.C., 280 F. 895, affirmed 2 Cir., 297 F. 728, certiorari denied 265 U.S. 585, 44 S.Ct. 459, 68 L.Ed. 1192, a patent infringement action, the defendant bluntly stated that its books and records had been lost. The court held that under the circumstances, the plaintiffs evidence as to the defendant’s costs should be accepted an…