CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

v.

JOSEPHINE C. KEPLER

Citator

Cited By

• Kloewer v. Burlington N., Inc., 512 F.2d 300 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …for damages resulting from a collision with a passing train. 73 N.W. 2d at 686. See also Neusbaum v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 162 Neb. 754, 77 N.W. 2d 299 (1956); Kepler v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co., 111 Neb. 273, 196 N.W. 161, cert. denied, 265 U.S. 589, 44 S.Ct. 635, 68 L.Ed. 1194 (1923). Nebraska has rejected the doctrine that a driver must stop, look and listen before going upon a crossing. As early as 1910 the Nebraska Supreme Court, upholding a plaintiff’s verdict in a crossing case in Crabtr…
• In re DCA Dev. Corp., 489 F.2d 43 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …erest is particularly important in proceedings under the Bankruptcy Act, where delay can often result in diminution of corporate assets with no corresponding benefit to creditors. See In re Inter-City Trust, 295 F. 495, 497 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 265 U.S. 589, 44 S.Ct. 635, 68 L.Ed. 1194 (1924).11 [*47] Moreover, even where formal notice to affected parties is omitted or is insufficient, informal or constructive-notice which provides them with the same opportunity for a fair hearing can satisfy the proce…