SAMUEL S. LEWIS ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Flynn, 216 F.2d 354 (2d Cir. 1954)
  …and the recalling of Mrs. Kane, should have beep granted. All of these matters were for the trial Court’s discretion which, unless we find it clearly abused, we should not disturb. Lewis v. United States, 1 Cir., 1924, 295 F. 441, certiorari denied 265 U.S. 594, 44 S.Ct. 636, 68 L.Ed. 1197. Especially is this so on a matter of such delicacy as that involving the retention or discharge of a sitting juror, in which right judgment depends so heavily upon the impressions formed from direct contact. Reynolds v.…
• United States v. Abel, 258 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …of minor matters to which the accomplice testified. See People v. Nitzberg, 1941, 287 N.Y. 183, 38 N.E. 2d 490, 138 A.L.R. 1253; Commonwealth v. Holmes, 1879, 127 Mass. 424; but cf. Hoback v. United States, 4 Cir., 1924, 296 F. 5, certiorari denied, 265 U.S. 594, 44 S.Ct. 638, 68 L.Ed. 1197; United States v. Biebusch, C.C.E.D.Mo.1880, 1 F. 213; Aycock v. State, 1940, 62 Ga.App. 812, 10 S.E. 2d 84; Ettinger v. Commonwealth, 1881, 98 Pa. 338. Rhodes’ testimony tended to prove the truth of Hayhanen’s testimony…
• Obery v. United States, 217 F.2d 860 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …on for hearing on the merits, . Cf. Lewis v. United States, 1 Cir., 3924, 295 F. 441, 447: “ * * * no party can require the court, in effect, to argue his case by giving rulings based on a part only of the evidence * * *.” Certio-rari denied. 1924, 265 U.S. 594, 44 S.Ct. 636, 68 L.Ed. 1197. . The charge said in part: “The law is that this defendant is presumed to be innocent. The burden of proof is upon the Government to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Unless the Government sustains this burd…