GEORGE HARRISON, TRUSTEE, ETC.

v.

ANNA B. CHAMBERLAIN

Citator

Cited By

• Harrigan v. Bergdoll, 270 U.S. 560 (U.S. 1926)
  …suit wás .brought in the state -court. The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had run before.the suit was instituted. Its judgment was affirmed by the highest eoürt .of the State, 281 Pa. 186; This Court granted .a writ of certiorari. 266 U. S. 598. The reversal by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the judgment of the District Court insofar as it adjudged the .liability of Bergdoll was in accord with- the rule,- settled in the third circuit and elsewhere, that the order of assessment and levy i…
• Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Westinghouse, 270 U.S. 260 (U.S. 1926)
  …rce Act and a similar law of the State. A judgment for the defendant, entered in each case by the trial court, was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeals on the ground of want of consideration. 138 Va. 647. This.Court granted writs of certiorari. 266 U. S. 598. No question under the state law is before us. The service of spotting cars was included in the line haul charge under both interstate and state tariffs. The Railway contends that under the tariffs no obligation rested upon the carrier either to fu…
• In re Bastanchury Corp. v. Turner, 62 F.2d 537 (9th Cir. 1932)
  …s to dismiss the proceeding without prejudice to the institution of a plenary action by the trustee in any court of proper jurisdiction. Chamberlin v. Harrison (C. C. A.) 298 F. 926. This writ of certiorari was then granted. Harrison v. Chamberlain, 266 U. S. 598, 45 S. Ct. 98, 69 L. Ed. 460. “The contentions of the trustee aro: (1) That the'Circuit Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to review the order of the District Court under the appeal; and (2) that, even if such jurisdiction existed, the decree rev…