VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
A. J. MULLENS
VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY
A. J. MULLENS
266 U.S. 599
Supreme Court of the United States (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCaughn v. Ludington, 268 U.S. 106 (U.S. 1925)…ainst the Collector in a federal District Court in Pennsylvania to recover the amount so paid. Judgment was entered for the defendant. 290 Fed. 604. This was reversed by the Court of Appeals. 1 Fed. (2d) 689. And this writ of certiorari was granted. 266 U. S. 599. The case is governed by the decision in United States v. Flannery, supra. It was there, held, on the authority of Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 527, and Walsh v. Brewster, 255 U. S. 536, that the Act allowed a deduction to the extent only that an…
-
Gee Shew Hong v. Nagle, 18 F.2d 248 (9th Cir. 1927)…by the medical officers was final and that the second examination and certificate were unauthorized and void. This contention finds support in the decision in United States v. Tod (C. C. A.) 1 F.(2d) 246, but a writ of certiorari was there granted, 266 U. S. 599, 45 S. Ct. 125, 69 L. Ed. 461, and the judgment was later reversed on confession of error by the Solicitor General, 267 U. S. 571, 45 S. Ct. 227, 69 L. Ed. 793. We cannot agree that the medical certificate has any such finality or conelusiveness as…