MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA
v.
JENNIE V. MIXER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Modern Woodmen of America, a fraternal beneficiary society incorporated in Illinois, issued a certificate to a member whose wife sought to collect benefits after he disappeared for ten years. The Supreme Court held that membership rights in such corporations must be governed by the law of the state granting incorporation, not the law of the state where the member joined or where suit was brought, and therefore the corporation's bylaws limiting recovery during the member's life expectancy period were valid and binding. The Court reversed Nebraska's judgment for the plaintiff, establishing that states cannot impose membership rights against a fraternal corporation that are refused under the domiciliary state's law.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice . Holmes delivered the opinion of the Coürt.
This is a suit by the beneficiary of a certificate issued by a fraternal beneficiary society incorporated in Illinois. The member to whom the certificate was issued was the plaintiff’s husband and the .ground of recovery is 'that the husband had disappeared and had pot been heard of for ten years before this suit was brought. His expeqtancy of life according to the tables had not expired and the de-fence is a by-law of the-Corporation to the effect that. “ long continued absence of any member unheard of shall not ... give any right to recover on any benefit certificate . . . until the full term of'the member’s expectancy of life, according to the National Fraternal Congress Table of Mortality, has expired, . . . and this law shall be in full force and effect, any statute of any, State or country or rule of common law of any state or country to the contrary notwithstanding.”
The only facts that need be mentioned are that the certificate seems to have been issued in South Dakota, although there was no allegation or proof concerning the law of that State, and that it was issued in 1901, while the by-law relied upon was not adopted until 1908. But the by-law has been held valid and binding upon the members of the Corporation by the Supreme Court off Illinois, although they had become members before the change. Steen v. Modern Woodmen of America, 296 Ill. 104. The Supreme Court of Nebraska affirmed a judgment for the plaintiff, seemingly, from the cases, cited, on the ground either that the rule of evidence must be determined by the lex fori, or, more probably, that the bylaw was unreasonable. 197 N. W. 129. The result is that if the validity of the by-law ought to be determined by the laws of Illinois, the plaintiff is allowed to recover upon a state of facts which the contract expressly stipulates shall not give her that right. A writ of certiorari was issued by this Court. 265 U. S. 576. -
The indivisible unity between the members of a corporation of this kind in respect of the fund from which their rights are to be enforced and the consequence that their rights must be determined by a single iaw, is elaborated in Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. Green, 237 U. S. 531, 542. The act of becoming & member is something more than a contract, it is entering into a complex and abiding relation, and as marriage looks to domicil, membership looks to and must be governed by the law of the State granting the incorporation. We need not consider what other States may refuse to do, but we deem it established that they cannot attach .to membership rights against, the Company that are refused by the law. of the domicil. It does not matter that the member joined in another State. In the above cited case Green, became a member of a Massachusetts corporation in New York, and the State Court held on ordinary principles of contract that his rights were governed by New York law-' Green v. Royal Arcanum, 206 N. Y. 591, 597. But the decision was reversed and it was held a failure to give full faith and credit to the Massachusetts charter as construed by the Massachusetts Court that Green was relieved, by decree from paying assessments increased by the corporation after his contract was máde. We are of opinion that the decision in that case governs this, and that the judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
Harris Inv. Co. v. Gurney P. Hood, 123 Fla. 598 (Fla. 1936)…oration) is something more than a contract, it is entering into a complex and abiding relation, and as marriage looks to domicile, membership looks to and must be governed by the law of the State granting the incorporation.’ Modern Woodmen v. Mixer, 267 U. S. 544, 551, 69 L. Ed. 783, 785; 45 S. Ct. 389. Compare Supreme Court R. A. v. Green, 237 U. S. 531, 59 L. Ed. 1089, 35 S. Ct. 724, L. R. A. 1916A 771; Hancock Nat. Bank v. Farnum, 176 U. S. 640, 44 L. Ed. 622, 20 S. Ct. 509; McDermott v. Woodhouse, 87 N.…1 / 2
-
Home Ins. Co. v. Dick, 281 U.S. 397 (U.S. 1930)…roperty without due process of law. Compañía General de Tabacos v. Collector of Internal Revenue, 275 U. S. 87; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Dunken, 266 U. S. 389; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Dodge, 246 U. S. 357. Compare Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer, 267 U. S. 544, 551.5 The cases relied upon, in which it was held that a State may lengthen its statute of limitations, are not in point. [*409] See Atchafalaya Land Co. v. Williams Cypress Co., 258 U. S. 190; National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.,…1 / 2
-
Bradford Elec. Light Co., Inc. v. Clapper, 286 U.S. 145 (U.S. 1932)…tion, which declares that “ full faith ,and credit shall be given in each State to the public acts ... of every other State.” That a statute [*155] is a “ public act ” within the meaning of that clause is settled. Modern Woodmen of America v. Mixer, 267 U. S. 544, 550, 551; Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Dunken, 266 U. S. 389, 393. See Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. George, 233 U. S. 354, 360; Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Wiggins Ferry Co., 119 U. S. 615, 622.3 A federal court sitting in New Hampshire is bound equall…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (25 total)
- Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1907)
- Canada S. Ry. Co. v. Gebhard and Another, 109 U.S. 527 (U.S. 1883)
- N.Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Cravens, 178 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1900)
- Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McCue, 223 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1912)
- Supreme Council of the Royal Arcanum v. Green, 237 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1915)
- Relfe v. Rundle, 103 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1880)
- Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Cheek, 259 U.S. 530 (U.S. 1922)
- Supreme Lodge v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1924)
- Hartford Life Ins. Co. v. IBS, 237 U.S. 662 (U.S. 1915)
- Flash and Others v. Conn, 109 U.S. 371 (U.S. 1883)