INDIAN REFINING COMPANY

v.

JOHN C. TAYLOR

Citator

Cited By

• Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (U.S. 1960)
  …in 1914 by a unanimous Court including Mr. Justice Holmes and Mr. Justice Hughes. Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383, 398. The rule has since that time been applied in this Court’s unanimous per curiam decision in 1925 in Center v. United States, 267 U. S. 575, and for nearly half a century, as a matter of course, in federal prosecutions without number throughout the United States. In 1927, a unanimous Court, on which sat Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Brandéis and Mr. Justice Stone, thus acknowledged th…
• Alexander v. United States, 290 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …had the right, in a criminal prosecution, to introduce evidence improperly seized by state officers operating entirely on their own account. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652, L.R.A.1915B, 834; Center v. United States, 267 U.S. 575, 45 S.Ct. 230, 69 L.Ed. 795; Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28, 47 S.Ct. 248, 71 L.Ed. 520; Manning v. United States, 5 Cir., 1960, 274 F. 2d 926, reversed on rehearing 5 Cir., 280 F. 2d 422; Huff v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 273 F. 2d 56; Kend…
• Rios v. United States, 256 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …* * * It is not a search by a federal official if evidence secured by state authorities is turned over to the federal authorities on a silver platter. * * * Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28, 33, 47 S.Ct. 248, 71 L.Ed. 52; Center v. United States, 267 U.S. 575, 45 S.Ct. 230, 69 L.Ed. 795, per curiam, as explained in Gambino v. United States, 275 U.S. 310, 317, 48 S.Ct. 137, 72 L.Ed. 293; Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 398, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652. This court has long applied the “silver platter”…

Authorities Cited

• Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1920)
• Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1915)
• Tex. Co. v. Brown, 258 U.S. 466 (U.S. 1922)