EX PARTE BARKER

Citator

Cited By

• Walker v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., Inc., 193 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1952)
  …improper to take the issue from them. Judgment reversed; new trial ordered. . Frese v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co., 263 U.S. 1, 44 S.Ct. 1, 68 L.Ed. 131; Davis v. Kennedy, 266 U.S. 147, 45 S.Ct. 33, 69 L.Ed. 212; Yadkin R. R. Co. v. [*774] Sigmon, 267 U.S. 577, 45 S.Ct. 230, 69 L.Ed. 796; Unadilla Valley Ry. Co. v. Caldine, 278 U.S. 139, 49 S.Ct. 91, 73 L.Ed. 224; Southern Ry. Co. v. Young-blood, 286 U.S. 313, 52 S.Ct. 518, 76 L.Ed. 1124. . Southern Ry. Co. v. Hylton, 6 Cir., 37 F. 2d 843; Paster v. Penn…
• Bradley v. Nw. Pac. R. Co., 44 F.2d 683 (9th Cir. 1930)
  …him another motive for obeying an order which he was already bound to obey. Indeed, as the appellee points out in his brief, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a short memorandum opinion in Yadkin R. R. Co. et al. v. Sigmon, Administratrix, 267 U. S. 577, 45 S. Ct. 230, 69 L. Ed. 796, has passed upon the exact question involved here. In that case, as appears from the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, Sigmon v. Southern R. Co., 186 N. C. 519, 120 S. E. 56, the administratrix had recove…

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Pridgeon, 153 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1894)