UNITED STATES
v.
LUCIA NAPONIELLO ET AL.

U.S. | 1925-03-02
No. 341
267 U.S. 577 Supreme Court of the United States (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per [*578] Curiam.

Mr. Charles 'N. Goodnow for defendants in. error in support of the motion. Solicitor General Beck and Assistant Attorney General Donovan for the United States, in opposition to the motion.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farmers and Mechanics National Bank v. Wilkinson, 266 U. S. 503; Union Trust Co. v. Westhus, 228 U. S. 519, 522-524; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 331-334.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Walker v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., Inc., 193 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1952)
    …improper to take the issue from them. Judgment reversed; new trial ordered. . Frese v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co., 263 U.S. 1, 44 S.Ct. 1, 68 L.Ed. 131; Davis v. Kennedy, 266 U.S. 147, 45 S.Ct. 33, 69 L.Ed. 212; Yadkin R. R. Co. v. [*774] Sigmon, 267 U.S. 577, 45 S.Ct. 230, 69 L.Ed. 796; Unadilla Valley Ry. Co. v. Caldine, 278 U.S. 139, 49 S.Ct. 91, 73 L.Ed. 224; Southern Ry. Co. v. Young-blood, 286 U.S. 313, 52 S.Ct. 518, 76 L.Ed. 1124. . Southern Ry. Co. v. Hylton, 6 Cir., 37 F. 2d 843; Paster v. Penn…
  • Bradley v. Nw. Pac. R. Co., 44 F.2d 683 (9th Cir. 1930)
    …him another motive for obeying an order which he was already bound to obey. Indeed, as the appellee points out in his brief, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a short memorandum opinion in Yadkin R. R. Co. et al. v. Sigmon, Administratrix, 267 U. S. 577, 45 S. Ct. 230, 69 L. Ed. 796, has passed upon the exact question involved here. In that case, as appears from the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, Sigmon v. Southern R. Co., 186 N. C. 519, 120 S. E. 56, the administratrix had recove…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw