JAMES C. DAVIS, FEDERAL AGENT, ETC.,
v.
E. H. PRINGLE, TRUSTEE
JAMES C. DAVIS, FEDERAL AGENT, ETC.,
E. H. PRINGLE, TRUSTEE
267 U.S. 588
Supreme Court of the United States (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. Voss, 271 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1926)
-
Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Thompson Mfg. Co., 270 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1926)…. See Thompson Manufacturing Co. v. Railroad, 93 W. Va. 3. The second trial before a jury resulted in a judgment for the respondent, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, 99 W. Va. 670. This court granted certiorari, 267 U. S. 588. Jud. Code, § 237. [*420] Petitioner supplied respondent, at its request, with two box cars for the transportation of a quantity of sheet iron .gas stoves in car load lots from Huntington, West Virginia, to Kansas City, Missouri. The stoves were- sh…
-
Mellon v. Weiss, 270 U.S. 565 (U.S. 1926)…ision ordered judgment for the defendant. The Supreme Judicial Court reversed that order and directed the trial court to enter judgment for the plaintiff. Weiss v. Director General of Railroads, 250 Mass. 12. This Court granted a writ of certiorari, 267 U. S. 588, on January 26, 1925. Since then, Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co., Inc., 268 U. S. 638, 640, 642, has settled that a suit against a railroad company is not a suit against the Director General; that § 206(d) of Transportation Act, 1920, authorized substi…