HOWARD S. MELLOT

v.

CHARLES R. MABEE ET AL., TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Townley, 665 F.2d 579 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …. Beecroft, 608 F. 2d 753, 757 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Diamond, 430 F. 2d 688, 691-92 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Painter, 314 F. 2d 939, 943 (4th Cir. 1963); Moare v. United States, 2 F. 2d 839, 842-43 (7th Cir. 1924), cert. denied, 267 U.S. 599, 45 S.Ct. 354, 69 L.Ed. 807 (1925). . Although the agreement expressly called for this list to be provided to Townley, and although Townley had a copy of the dissolution agreement, neither Townley nor his able trial attorney thought to secure this…
• Oxford Paper Co. v. The Nidarholm, 282 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1931)
  …his expert knowledge and judgment, to control the disposal of cargo so as to avoid dangers to it from any consequent unseaworthiness of the vessel. Olsen v. United States Shipping Co., supra; The Oakley C. Curtis, 4 F. (2d) 979;. certiorari denied, 267 U. S. 599; The Dana, 190 Fed. 650; cf. Corsar v. Spreckels, supra; The Thames, 61 Fed. 1014. Respondent argues that the responsibility of the ship, when loaded by the charterer, is limited to faulty stowage of cargo which endangers the ship, and that when th…
• United States v. Starr, 816 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …dulent pretenses, representations, or promises.” These words were added by statutory amendment at the turn of the century, and the reason for the addition was aptly described in Moore v. United States, 2 F. 2d 839, 841 (7th Cir. 1924), cert. denied, 267 U.S. 599, 45 S.Ct. 354, 67 L.Ed. 807 (1925): The added words were evidently intended to enlarge the scope of the act, and to denounce and punish the use of the mails in execution not only of a scheme to defraud, but also of a scheme to obtain money or prope…