NICK CHOLSKOS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Cohn v. United States Shipping Bd., 20 F.2d 56 (6th Cir. 1927)
  …cover the difference in market value. This conclusion is supported by The Caledonia, 157 U. S. 124, 139, 15 S. Ct. 537, 39 L. Ed. 644; Carver on Carriage of Goods by Sea, § 726; United States v. Middleton (4 C. C. A.) 3 F.(2d) 384, certiorari denied 267 U. S. 604, 45 S. Ct. 463, 69 L. Ed. 809; The Styria (2 C. C. A.) 101 F. 728. The authorities bearing on this proposition are so fully reviewed, and the reasons supporting the conclusion so carefully stated by Circuit Judge Rose in the Middleton Case, that we…
• United States v. Dimsdale, 410 F.2d 358 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …re the participants crossed the state line, which the proof showed to have been the case, whether or not Mrs. Weems engaged in prostitution after she reached the state is immaterial, Cholakos v. United States, 6 Cir., 1924, 2 F. 2d 447, cert. denied 267 U.S. 604, 45 S.Ct. 464, 69 L.Ed. 809; Rizzo v. United States, 3 Cir., 1921, 275 F. 51. The real object of the trip is the controlling consideration, United States v. Jamerson, D.C., 8 Cir., 1944, 60 F.Supp. 281. See, also, Long v. United States, 10 Cir., 19…