UNITED STATES
v.
BALTIMORE POST

U.S. | 1925-05-25
No. 847
Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of- this case.
268 U.S. 388 Supreme Court of the United States (1925) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 69 L. Ed. 1009 · 45 S. Ct. 560 · 1925 U.S. LEXIS 575 · SCDB 1924-147
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Sutherland

Mr. Justice Sutherland delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case comes here from a judgment of the lower court dismissing the indictment, 2 Fed. (2d) 761, and is the same in all respects as No. 768, United States v. Dickey et al., just decided, ante, p. 378. Upon that authority the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of-this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

  • Bendix Aviation Corp. v. Glass, 195 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1952)
    …1084 (1934). . See Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., 1941, 312 U.S. 1, 10, 61 S.Ct. 422, 424, 85 L.Ed. 479; Cf., Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. Murphree, 1946, 326 U.S. 438, 66 S.Ct. 242, 90 L.Ed. 185; Meek v. Centre County Banking Co., 1925, 268 U.S. 426, 45 S.Ct. 560, 69 L.Ed. 1028. . Cf., Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. U. S. ex rel. Gibson, 1909, 213 U.S. 10, 18-19, 29 S.Ct. 324, 53 L.Ed. 675; Hudson v. Parker, 1895, 156 U.S. 277, 284, 15 S.Ct. 450, 39 L.Ed. 424; both cited in support of the language of Sibbach…
  • In re Fid. Mortg. Invs. v. Camelia Builders, Inc., 550 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1976)
    …s enacted thereunder may not add to, subtract from or vary the provisions of the bankruptcy law and cannot extend the jurisdiction of a referee beyond that which is conferred upon him by statute. Meek v. Centre County Banking Co., 268 U.S. 426, 434, 45 S.Ct. 560, 69 L.Ed. 1028 (1925); In re State Thread Co., 126 F. 2d 296, 300 (6th Cir. 1942). The jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court is basically in rem, and possession of the res is a prerequisite to the court’s summary exercise of its power. Callaway v. Ben…
  • Benitez v. Bank OF Nova Scotia (three cases), 109 F.2d 743 (1st Cir. 1940)
    …noteworthy that the Supreme Court itself, has had occasion to disregard a general order in bank-ruptcy inadvertently carried over and re-published after a significant but unnoticed change of the law. Meek v. Centre County Banking Co., 268 U.S. 426, 45 S.Ct. 560, 69 L.Ed. 1028. In all candor we cannot now say that we believe our previously announced conclusion to be erroneous. That conclusion seemed to us plainly indicated on the face of the statute. We are far from implying that appellant would qualify as…

Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw