R. O. BASS
v.
THE CITY OF CLIFTON
R. O. BASS
THE CITY OF CLIFTON
268 U.S. 681
Supreme Court of the United States (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Calcasieu-Marine Nat'l Bank OF Lake Charles v. Am. Emp'rs' Ins. Co., 533 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1976)…ate Bank, 1917, 16 Ala. App. 101, 75 So. 695, 696. Loans, in substance, have been found when the issue is relevant to whether a corporation’s actions have been ultra vires, see Watson v. Jackson, Tex.Civ.App.1924, 264 S.W. 603, 610, error dismissed, 268 U.S. 681, 45 S.Ct. 637, 69 L.Ed. 1154; Schramm v. Bank of California National Association, 1933, 143 Or. 546, 20 P. 2d 1093, 1096, and when the issue is relevant to the duty of fair dealing of one who receives money, see Bank of the Republic v. Baxter, 1858,…
Authorities Cited
- Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1905)
- Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1920)
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1915)