GEORGE CHAPRALES
v.
W. I. BIDDLE, WARDEN, ETC.
GEORGE CHAPRALES
W. I. BIDDLE, WARDEN, ETC.
268 U.S. 682
Supreme Court of the United States (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Decree affirmed ex mero motu, upon the authority of Ex parte Parks, 93 U. S. 18; Ex parte Yarborough, 110 U. S. 651; Henry v. Henkel, 235 U. S. 219; McMicking v. Shields, 238 U. S. 99.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Kan. City Journal-Post Co. Bostian v. Rosen, 144 F.2d 808 (8th Cir. 1944)…. 2d 747, 752, certiorari denied 281 U.S. 756, 50 S.Ct. 407, 74 L.Ed. 1166; Cleveland Trust Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 4 Cir., 55 F. 2d 211, 214; Jackman v. St. Louis & H. R. Co., 304 Mo. 319, 263 S.W. 230, appeal dismissed 268 U.S. 682, 45 S.Ct. 641, 69 L.Ed. 1155. For a distinguishable situation see Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Atlantic Coast Electric R. Co., 3 Cir., 138 F. 517, 525, 526. Some of the evidence in the record tends to suggest that, as a matter of fact, the par…
Authorities Cited
- Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1884)
- Henry v. Henkel, 235 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1914)
- Ex parte Parks, 93 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1876)
- McMICKING v. Schields, 238 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1915)