A. J. BYARS
v.
THE UNITED STATES
A. J. BYARS
THE UNITED STATES
268 U.S. 684
Supreme Court of the United States (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co., 273 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1927)…at since the decision above cited the law had grown more liberal in granting relief. It therefore reversed the decree below. 7 F. (2d) 603. In view of the conflict between the Circuit Courts of Appeals a writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 268 U. S. 684. • At the hearing below all attention seems to have been concentrated on the question passed upon and the forcibly stated reasons that induced this Court of Appeals to differ from that for the Sixth Circuit. But, upon a closer scrutiny of the bill…
-
Chicago & Nw. Ry. Co. v. Alvin R. Durham Co., 271 U.S. 251 (U.S. 1926)…Michigan Central R. Co. v. [Mark] Owen [& Co.], 256 U. S. 427, . . . the railway did have the custody, control and possession of the interstate shipment.” 229 Mich. 468. See also 224 Mich. 477; 265 U. S. 580. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. 268 U. S. 684. The sole question for decision is whether the Railway is liable as garnishee. The facts in' the two cases are similar, but the legal questions presented for decision are wholly different. In the Mark Owen -Case it was sought to enforce under the f…