BENJAMIN B. MONTALVO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BENJAMIN B. MONTALVO, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
170 So. 2d 466
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1965)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause is before us on appellee’s motion to quash this appeal.
Appellant was granted a new trial following his conviction of manslaughter. Upon his second trial, he again entered a plea of guilty to manslaughter and was sentenced to ten years with credit thereon for fifty-two days spent in the county jail.
The defendant filed his notice of appeal. On defendant’s motion this court dismissed the appeal. Thereafter, defendant filed a motion to quash and dismiss in the trial court, and the trial court entered its order denying said motion. It is from this order denying the motions that defendant appeals.
It appears from the order appealed that it is not a final appealable order, and therefore the appeal should be quashed.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amezcua v. Cortez, 314 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
-
Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Palm Beach Cnty. v. First Fla. Utils., Inc., 28 Fla. Supp. 175 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)…to the law for the violation of its mandate as if the writ has been regularly served upon him by the proper officer of the court.” This rule has been uniformly upheld in our state. See Savage v. Winfield, 11 So. 2d 302; Pascul v. George Davis & Co., 170 So. 2d 466. Respondents vigorously contend that the provision of paragraph 6 of the injunction order, that it “shall become effective by service of a copy hereof upon any officer of the defendant corporation or upon an agent or employee of the defendant in ch…
-
The Marine Bank OF Monroe Cnty. v. Richard C. Milstein Ad Litem in the Guardianship of Madeline Laughead, 533 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…975), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 1053, 96 S.Ct. 782, 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976); Savage v. Winfield, 152 Fla. 165, 11 So. 2d 302 (Fla.1943); Thebault v. Canova, 11 Fla. 143 (1867); 60 C.J.S. Motions & Orders § 65 (1969); Compare Pascal v. George Davis & Co., 170 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). Of course, after the funds are returned, the bank would continue to have its right, as any other creditor, to pursue the assets of the wards for collection of its due obligations upon proper notice and petition, to the guardian…