MILES DRAWDY, APPELLANT,
v.
ARLINGTON LUMBER COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1965-01-07
No. F-344
STURGIS, C. J., RAWLS, J., and PATTEN, GEORGE L., Associate Judge, concur.
170 So. 2d 468 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Smith’s Bakery, Inc. v. Jernigan, 134 So.2d 519 (Fla.App. 1st, 1961).

STURGIS, C. J., RAWLS, J., and PATTEN, GEORGE L., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rebia Gladys Sharpe v. Sharpe, 267 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …ion of the amount of alimony in the absence of a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Singer v. Singer, Fla.App.1972, 3rd D.C.A., 262 So. 2d 731, filed May 30, 1972; Mufson v. Mufson, Fla.App.1971, 245 So. 2d 110; Tomaino v. Martz, Fla.App.1965, 170 So. 2d 468. However, we think that such a showing appears upon the undisputed facts of this record. Cf. Preston v. Preston, Fla. App.1968, 216 So. 2d 31; Massey v. Massey, Fla.App. 1967, 205 So. 2d 1; Klein v. Klein, Fla.App. 1960, 122 So. 2d 205. The record e…
  • Lovie Royal v. Royal, 263 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …ion of the amount of alimony in the absence of a clear showing of an abuse of discretion. Singer v. Singer, Fla.App.1972, 3rd D.C.A., 262 So. 2d 731, filed May 30, 1972; Mufson v. Mufson, Fla.App.1971, 245 So. 2d 110; Tomaino v. Martz, Fla.App.1965, 170 So. 2d 468. However, we think that such a showing appears upon the undisputed facts of this record. Cf. Preston v. Preston, Fla.App.1968, 216 So. 2d 31; Massey v. Massey, Fla.App.1967, 205 So. 2d 1; Klein v. Klein, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 205. The record esta…
  • Dores R. Fishman v. Fishman, 245 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …the chancellor, and his rulings on the matter are supported by the evidence. The burden on the appellant to show an abuse of discretion in that matter was not met. French v. French, Fla.App.1962, 146 So. 2d 584, 585; Tomaino v. Martz, Fla.App.1965, 170 So. 2d 468, 469; Ortiz v. Ortiz, Fla. App.1968, 211 So. 2d 243; and Frischkorn v. Frischkorn, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 380. See generally § 61.14, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. [*259] Accordingly, the portion of the decree establishing the lump sum alimony in the amount o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw