APALACHICOLA LAND & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ET AL.
v.
W. A. MCRAE, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.

U.S. | 1925-10-19
No. 43
269 U.S. 531 Supreme Court of the United States (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252, U. S. 1, 5-6.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Robert v. LEE, 711 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …f all lands under the navigable waters within the state, ... and also all tidelands, viz. lands covered and uncovered by the daily ebb and flow of normal tides”); Apalachicola Land & Dev. Co. v. McRae, 86 Fla. 393, 98 So. 505, 520 (1923), dismissed, 269 U.S. 531, 46 S.Ct. 22, 70 L.Ed. 397 (1925) ("land grants to private ownership do not include lands under navigable waters or tidelands, unless such an intent clearly appears from acts of competent authority to pass title to such lands”). Because these and…
  • …nd a half preparing its case for presentation to the Commission, at a cost, including a new appraisal and inventory, of more than $1,200,000. Hearings are now in progress. [*90] For the history of the investigation and litigation, see in this Court: 269 U. S. 531; 282 U. S. 133; 283 U. S. 794; 283 U. S. 808; 292 U. S. 151; in the lower court: 39 F. (2d) 157; 38 F. (2d) 77; 3 F. Supp. 595; in the Commission: 7 Opinions and Orders of Ill. P. U. Comm. 1920, 888; 8 id. 1921, 372; 3 Opinions and Orders of Ill. Co…
  • Smith v. Ill. Bell Tel. Co., 282 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1930)
    …of the intrastate service of the complainant, the Illinois Bell Telephone Company. An interlocutory injunction, restraining the enforcement of the rates, was granted on December 21,1923, and the order was affirmed by this Court-on October 19, 1925. 269 U. S. 531. This interlocutory order was made upon the condition that, if the injunction were dissolved, the complainant should refund to its subscribers the amounts paid by them in excess of the sums chargeable under the Commission’s order. The suit was not b…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw