JOSEPH HODGSON
v.
THE MIDWEST OIL COMPANY ET AL.

U.S. | 1925-10-26
No. 69
269 U.S. 534 Supreme Court of the United States (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Transferred to the Circuit Cojirt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit upon the authority of the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 3, 39 Stat. 726, and section 238 of the Judicial Code as amended by section 238 (a), act of September 14, 1922, c. 305; Smith v. Apple, 264 U. S. 274. Order that case be transferred entered October 21, 1925. Messrs. Tyson Dynes, Jr., Tyson S. Dynes, Peter H. Holme and Harold D. Roberts for defendants in error.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chem. Co., 158 F.2d 909 (10th Cir. 1947)
    …n the sound judicial discretion of the trial court and that its action in respect thereto will not be overturned on appeal unless there was an abuse of discretion. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. City of Cleburne, 5 Cir., 296 F. 643, affirmed, 269 U.S. 534, 46 S.Ct. 99, 70 L.Ed. 398; Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 1 Cir., 19 F. 2d 744, affirmed, 278 U.S. 41, 49 S.Ct. 52, 73 L.Ed. 170; Freund v. Johnson, 7 Cir., 46 F. 2d 272, certiorari denied, 283 U.S. 849, 51 S.Ct. 495, 75 L.Ed. 1457; Ban…
  • Hodgson v. Midwest OIL Co., 17 F.2d 71 (8th Cir. 1927)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw