STATE OF OKLAHOMA

v.

STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER

Citator

Cited By

• Alton v. Alton, 207 F.2d 667 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …38 U.S. 847, 70 S.Ct. 87, 94 L.Ed. 518; Kitagawa v. Shipman, 9 Cir., 1931, 54 F. 2d 313, certiorari denied, 1932, 286 U.S. 543, 52 S.Ct. 496, 76 L.Ed. 1281; Lastra v. New York & Porto Rico S.S. Co., 1 Cir., 1924, 2 F. 2d 812, appeal dismissed, 1925, 269 U.S. 536, 46 S.Ct. 106, 70 L.Ed. 400; Gonzalez v. People of Porto Rico, 1 Cir., 1931, 51 F. 2d 61; People of Puerto Rico v. Eastern Sugar Associates, 1 Cir., 1946, 156 F. 2d 316, certiorari denied, 1946, 329 U.S. 772, 67 S.Ct. 190, 91 L. Ed. 664. The simila…
• Texas v. Oklahoma, 457 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1982)
  …g it.” 3. As a result of the partial decree in 1923 and other partial decrees arising from the same controversy, a boundary commission was established to take evidence, find facts and report to the Court. Said Commission filed a documentary report, 269 U. S. 536 (1925), styled as the Third Report of the Boundary Commissioners. At page 41 of said Report appears the following entry: VII “IN GRAYSON COUNTY, TEXAS OPPOSIVE MARSHALL AND BRYAN COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA. “Public Hearing: Sherman, Texas, May 7, 1925 “…