UNITED STATES
v.
KHLEBER MILDER VAN ZANDT ET AL.
UNITED STATES
KHLEBER MILDER VAN ZANDT ET AL.
270 U.S. 630
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for failure to file appeal in time as required by § 6 of the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 727.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Anargyros v. Edwards (S.D.N.Y. 1927)…. It applies uniformly to manufacturers of cigarettes whether their product be sold for domestic consumption or for export. Peck v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 165, 38 S. Ct. 432, 62 L. Ed. 1049; National Paper & Type Co. v. Edwards (D. C.) 292 F. 635, affirmed 270 U. S. 630, 46 S. Ct. 335, 70 L. Ed. 770. That Congress did not intend to exempt manufacturers of cigarettes sold in export from the tax imposed by section 1002 of title 10 of the Revenue Act of 1918 is further indicated by the fact that section 1310 (e), bei…
-
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., Inc. v. United States, 77 F.2d 65 (3d Cir. 1935)…U. S. 397, 24 S. Ct. 376, 48 L. Ed. 496; Peck & Co. v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 165, 38 S. Ct. 432, 62 L. Ed. 1049; United States Glue Co. v. Oak Creek, 247 U. S. 321, 38 S. Ct. 499, 62 L. Ed. 1135, Ann. Cas. 1918E, 748; National Paper & Type Co. v. Bowers, 270 U. S. 630, 46 S. Ct. 335, 70 L. Ed. 770, that the Act in question is not unconstitutional when applied to the facts of this case. The remaining question is whether the Act is invalid because inconsistent with section 3385 of the Revised Statutes. That provis…