LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

v.

ANNA HUBEN, AS ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Elgie & Co. v. S. S. "S. A. Nederburg", 599 F.2d 1177 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …ation on issuing carriers. See Chicago & N. W. Ry. v. Stephens Nat. Bank, 75 F. 2d 398, 401 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 738, 55 S.Ct. 650, 79 L.Ed. 1685 (1935); Chicago & N. W. Ry. v. Bewsher, 6 F. 2d 947, 953 (8th Cir. 1925), cert. denied, 270 U.S. 641, 46 S.Ct. 205, 70 L.Ed. 775 (1926); Leigh Ellis & Co. v. Payne, supra, 274 F. at 446.6 [*1181] There can be no question that plaintiff gave value in good faith relying upon defendant’s bill of lading. Defendant conceded plaintiff’s status as a holde…
• W. A. Stackpole Motor Transp., Inc. v. Malden Spinning & Dyeing Co., 263 F.2d 47 (1st Cir. 1958)
  …or wholly destroyed, are so badly damaged in transit by the carrier’s negligence that “they cannot be delivered in specie.” The Willdomino, 3 Cir., 1924, 300 F. 5, 21, certiorari granted 266 U.S. 597, 45 S.Ct. 98, 69 L.Ed. 460, certiorari dismissed 270 U.S. 641, 46 S.Ct. 205, 70 L.Ed. 776, affirmed on other grounds S.S. Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co., 1927, 272 U.S. 718, 47 S.Ct. 261, 71 L.Ed. 491. We are not aware of any cases applying this rule of maritime law in cases involving the carriage of goods…
• Cont'l Distrib. Co., Inc. v. Reading Co., 168 F.2d 967 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …nage was placed m those cars. Furthermore, if defendant itself is not bound by the weights recorded on the bills of lading, as is apparent from such cases as Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Bewsher, 8 Cir., 1925, 6 F. 2d 947, 952, certiorari denied 1926, 270 U.S. 641, 46 S.Ct. 205, 70 L.Ed. 775, and Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. American Line S. S. Corp., 2 Cir., 1938, 97 F. 2d 360, by the same token we should be reluctant to hold that a shipper of goods would be so bound by such notations, if he produced sufficient…