JAMES F. TODD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bailey v. Banister, 200 F.2d 683 (10th Cir. 1952)
  …64 S.Ct. 943, 88 L.Ed. 1563; United States v. Watashe, 10 Cir., 102 F. 2d 428; Johnson v. United States, 10 Cir., 64 F. 2d 674, certiorari denied 290 U.S. 651, 54 S.Ct. 68, 78 L.Ed. 565; United States v. Brown, 8 Cir., 8 F. 2d 564, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 644, 46 S.Ct. 210, 70 L.Ed. 777. Beaver’s title to the land in question contained a restriction against its alienation. This restriction was removed by the March 25, 1949 order, but the removal was conditional. It was to become effective only and simul…
• Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apts., Ltd., 508 F.2d 518 (10th Cir. 1974)
  …o the next appellate court (see, 25 C.F.R. § 16.7 (1974) ). It is not clear whether other parties are entitled to appeal. . See McCurtain v. Palmer, 121 F. 2d 1009 (10th Cir. 1941); United States v. Brown, 8 F. 2d 564 (8th Cir. 1925), cert. denied, 270 U.S. 644, 46 S.Ct. 210, 70 L.Ed. 777 (1926) holding that unapproved deeds must be cancelled whether or not the conveyances were made in good faith and for adequate consideration.…
• Clinkenbeard v. United States, 109 F.2d 730 (10th Cir. 1940)
  …[*732] land described in the deed was’ purchased for said Lillie Lena with funds held in trust by the United States for his benefit as a member of the Seminole tribe. In United States v. Brown, Oct. 29, 1925, 8 Cir., 8 F. 2d 564, certiorari denied, 270 U.S. 644, 46 S.Ct. 210, 70 L.Ed. 777, it was held that: “Where court permitted investment of royalties under departmental oil and gas lease covering allotment of full-blood minor Creek Indian in agricultural land, requiring deed to contain restriction on ali…