NORTH GERMAN LLOYD
v.
UNITED STATES
NORTH GERMAN LLOYD
UNITED STATES
270 U.S. 645
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fiano v. United States, 291 F.2d 113 (9th Cir. 1961)…t be described in such detail that the accused is informed of the charge against him. Brown v. United States, supra; Pon Wing Quong v. United States, 9 Cir., 1940, 111 F. 2d 751; Yip Wah v. United States, 9 Cir., 1925, 8 F. 2d 478, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 645, 46 S.Ct. 336, 70 L.Ed. 777. The record on this appeal, and on the previous appeal, amply demonstrates that the accused had not the slightest difficulty in ascertaining the charge against him in all its details. The judgment denying petitioner rel…
-
United States v. Mayor & Council of City of Hoboken (D.N.J. 1928)…v. Railroad Supply Co., 244 U. S. 294, 37 S. Ct. 506, 61 L. Ed. 1148. Such judgments have been rendered as to both companies; the North German Lloyd in 61 Ct. Cl. 138 (in which Miller v. U. S., above cited, is followed — page 142), certiorari denied 270 U. S. 645, 46 S. Ct. 347, 70 L. Ed. 778, and the Hamburg-American in 59 Ct. Cl. 461, and 48 S. Ct. 470, 72 L. Ed. 822. In the last ease Mr. Justice MeReynolds said: “As Congress might have directed forfeiture of all property beneficially owned by enemy subjec…