HILLS BROTHERS

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Parke v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 142 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …for present purposes that the complaint alleged the existence of a public interest which the proof shows was necessarily involved in the merits of the case. Hills Brothers v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 9 F. 2d 481, 483, 484, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 662, 46 S.Ct. 471, 70 L.Ed. 787. The petitioners contend that there is no warrant for the fifth paragraph of the Commission’s order forbidding their use of the words “Smithsonian Institution” in their corporate name or in any other manner to designate…
• Stanley Labs., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 138 F.2d 388 (9th Cir. 1943)
  …petent testimony to support the findings.” See, also, Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 230, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83 L.Ed. 126; Hills Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 9 F. 2d 481, 484, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 662, 46 S.Ct. 471, 70 L.Ed. 787; Keller v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 132 F. 2d 59, 61; Ellers v. Railroad Retirement Board, 2 Cir., 132 F. 2d 636, 639. The petitioners complain that on cross-examination the lay witnesses stated merely that the…
• Keller v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 132 F.2d 59 (7th Cir. 1942)
  …upport the Commission’s finding. In view of its existence, the action of the Commission in refusing to strike Rinkenberger’s testimony, even if erroneous, is immaterial. Hills Bros. v. Federal Trade Comm., 9 Cir., 9 F. 2d 481, 484, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 662, 46 S.Ct. 471, 70 L.Ed. 787; Arkansas Wholesale Grocers’ Association v. Federal Trade Comm., 8 Cir., 18 F. 2d 866, certiorari denied 275 U.S. 533, 48 S.Ct. 30, 72 L.Ed. 411. Petitioners further complain that the cease and desist order is too broad…