STEVE SUPER AND BENJAMIN H. WILDER
v.
HUBERT WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, AS A MEMBER OF THE FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, AND WILLIAM M. JARDINE, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ETC.

U.S. | 1926-04-26
No. 262
271 U.S. 643 Supreme Court of the United States (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of (1) Barker v. Harvey, 181 U. S. 481; United States v. Title Insurance Company, 265 U. S. 472; (2) Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U. S. 553; Conley v. Ballinger, 216 U. S. 84, 90.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Martin v. Andrews, 238 F.2d 552 (9th Cir. 1956)
    …erer, supra. See, also, the discussions of the Hill case in Milliken v. Gill, 4 Cir., 211 F. 2d 869, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 827, 75 S.Ct. 47, 99 L.Ed. 652, and Reinecke v. Peacock, 7 Cir., 3 F. 2d 583, appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 271 U.S. 643, 46 S.Ct. 481, 70 L.Ed. 1128. . Except Morris v. United States, 4 Cir., 229 F. 2d 151, which has nothing to do with either taxes or injunctions. . Kaus v. Huston, 8 Cir., 120 F. 2d 183; Burke v. Mingori, 10 Cir., 128 F. 2d 996, certiorari denied s…
  • United States v. Ringrose, 788 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1986)
    …y.” See Sum-ma Corp. v. California ex rel. State Lands Commission, 466 U.S. 198, 208, 104 S.Ct. 1751, 1757, 80 L.Ed.2d 237 (1984). This same principle was applied to non-mission Indians in Super v. Work, 3 F. 2d 90 (D.C.Cir.1925), aff’d per curiam, 271 U.S. 643, 46 S.Ct. 481, 70 L.Ed. 1128 (1926). The Court of Appeals observed that Barker and Title Insurance involved mission Indians while Super concerned “Indians [who] were merely roving bands,” 3 F. 2d at 91, but found the distinction irrelevant. The Supr…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw