DAN BARTONCINI
v.
UNITED STATES
DAN BARTONCINI
UNITED STATES
273 U.S. 636
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. Mr. Ernest B. D. Spagnoli for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (U.S. 1944)…animously reversed a judgment dismissing the complaint and held that the judges acted pursuant to state law and that the State of Texas, by its statute, had denied the voter the equal protection secured by the Fourteenth Amendment. Nixon v. Herndon, 273 U. S. 636 (1927). In 1927 the legislature of Texas repealed the provision condemned by this court and enacted that every political party in the State might, through its Executive Committee, prescribe the qualifications of its own members and determine in its…
-
Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311 (U.S. 1928)…e effective date of the Act of February 13, 1925, the appeals should have been transferred to this Court. Compare Pascagoula National Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 269 U. S. 537; Salinger v. United States, 272 U. S. 542, 549; Rossi v. United States, 273 U. S. 636; Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 274 U. S. 181, 186. The want of a formal order of transfer would not have been fatal to our taking jurisdiction of the whole case, had it come before us on writ of error or appeal. Wagner Electr…
Authorities Cited
- Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1905)
- Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1920)
- Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U.S. 580 (U.S. 1915)