NEW YORK, ONTARIO & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

U.S. | 1927-01-10
No. 564
273 U.S. 652 Supreme Court of the United States (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

[*652] Per Curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of § 207 of the Judicial Code. United States v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 244 U. S. 82.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fed. Power Comm'n v. Metro. Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1938)
    …this' Court with directions to dismiss the petition. The “order” was not of the sort which brought it Within the purview of the. statute. It was a mere step in procedure. See, also, New York, O. & W. Ry. Co. v. United States, 14 F. 2d 850, affirmed 273 U. S. 652. Negative orders of the Commission are not reviewable. Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, 225 U. S. 282; Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. United States, 243 U. S. 412, 414. A final report by the Commission on value under § 19a of the Interstate Commerce…
  • Great N. Ry. Co. v. United States, 277 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1928)
  • Alton R.R. Co. v. United States, 287 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1932)
    …hority of Procter & Gamble Co. v. United States, 225 U. S. 282. Compare also, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Waste Merchants Association, 260 U. S. 32. Compare also, New York, O. & W. Ry. Co. v. United States, 14 F. (2d) 850, affirmed per curiam 273 U. S. 652.…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw