A. J. THIGPEN AND A. J. THIGPEN, JR.,
v.
MIDLAND OIL COMPANY

U.S. | 1927-01-17
No. 121
273 U.S. 658 Supreme Court of the United States (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of finality in the judgment of the court below, on the authority of Keike v. United States, 217 U. S. 423, 429. Application for certiorari also denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Great N. Ry. Co. v. Minnesota, 278 U.S. 503 (U.S. 1929)
    …l the state supreme court affirmed the judgment. 160 Minn. 515. A writ of error from this Court was-dismissed for want of jurisdiction resulting from an insufficient setting forth and waiver of claim of a substantial federal constitutional question. 273 U. S. 658. Thereafter, . the state supreme court vacated its judgment, granted a reargument upon the constitutional question, and again affirmed the trial court. 174 Minn.-3. The present appeal is from the judgment of the court below last described.. In Minn…
  • Keating v. Pub. Nat'l Bank, 284 U.S. 587 (U.S. 1931)
    …d. Bodkin v. Edward, 255 U. S. 221, 223; Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. Brotherhood of Clerks, 281 U. S. 548, 558; First National Bank v. Hartford, 273 U. S. 548; Minnesota v. First National Bank, 273 U. S. 561; Georgetown National Bank v. McFarland, 273 U. S. 658:…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw