E. A. EDENFIELD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Falcone, 109 F.2d 579 (2d Cir. 1940)
  …nited States, 6 Cir., 281 F. 2d 516, 520. The Fifth has, however, held otherwise, though by a divided court, Young v. United States, 5 Cir., 48 F. 2d 26. In that case the judges differed because of their interpretation of Edenfield v. United States, 273 U.S. 660, 47 S.Ct. 345, 71 L.Ed. 827, which, on the authority of United States v. Katz, 271 U.S. 354, 46 S.Ct. 513, 70 L.Ed. 986, reversed a conviction upon a count for conspiracy to manufacture liquor without a license. The indictment also contained a count…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Young v. United States, 48 F.2d 26 (5th Cir. 1931)
  …e of the conviction on the second set of counts which charged conspiracy to manufacture liquor without making a permanent record, on the authority of the Katz Case, supra; and it was remanded to the district court for resentence on the first counts. 273 U. S. 660, 47 S. Ct. 345, 71 L. Ed. 827. It is to be con-n , ,, o , ,, , ,, ceded. therefore, that the evidence was held , ’ ' r\ . . t. ^ • ,, by the Supreme Court to be sufficient to susj. n i » *i • > , -r> n tam the first count of each indictment. But th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Byrne Org., Inc. v. United States, 287 F.2d 582 (Ct. Cl. 1961)
  …aling or upon the apparent authority of such an agent. “This court held in Jacob Reed’s Sons, Inc. v. United States, 60 Ct. Cls. 97, affirmed, 273 U.S. 200 [47 S.Ct. 339, 71 L.Ed. 608], and A. L. Ferguson v. United States, 60 Ct.Cls. 649, affirmed, 273 U.S. 660 [47 S.Ct. 345, 71 L.Ed. 827], that one dealing with the United States is bound to know and take notice of the limited authority of an officer with whom he was dealing and the court will not imply that such an officer was acting under proper authorit…

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Katz, 271 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1926)