NEW YORK CENTRAL SECURITIES CORPORATION

v.

CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY AND NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Davis v. Dep't of Labor & Indus. of the State of Wash., 317 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1942)
  …rength to petitioner’s position are: Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. Dept. of Labor, 277 U. S. 135; Grant Smith-Porter Co. v. Rohde, 257 U. S. 469; Millers’ Underwriters v. Braud, 270 U. S. 59; Ex parte Rosengrant, 213 Ala. 202, 104 So. 409, affirmed 273 U. S. 664; State Industrial Board of N. Y. v. Terry & Tench Co., 273 U. S. 639, reported as Lahti v. Terry & Tench Co., 240 N. Y. 292, 148 N. E. 527; Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 276 U. S. 467. And note the dissenting view in Baizl…
• Works v. Span, 281 U.S. 222 (U.S. 1930)
  …Mr. Justice Stone, dissenting. I think the judgment below should be affirmed on the authority of Rosengrant v. Havard, 273 U. S. 664 (Feb. 28, 1927), which affirmed, without opinion but on the authority of Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, 257 U. S. 469 and Millers’ Indemnity Underwriters v. Braud, 270 U. S. 59, a judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama, Ex parte Rosengrant,…
• Emp'rs' Liab. Assurance Corp. v. Cook, 281 U.S. 233 (U.S. 1930)
  …medy by the Jones Act, and who are not within the purview of the Employers’ Liability Act, 35 Stat. 65 (45 U. S. C. A., § 51), are excluded from the benefits of a compensation act like that of Texas. The Court held otherwise in Rosengrant v. Havard, 273 U. S. 664, commented on in my opinion in John Baizley Iron Works v. Span, decided this day, ante, p. 222. The present case arose before the effective date of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor-Workers’ Act, 44 Stat. 424 (33 U. S. C. A., §§ 901, 950). But the reme…

Authorities Cited

• Gen. Inv. Co. v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co., 271 U.S. 228 (U.S. 1926)