CHARLES B. BEERY

v.

JAMES G. HOUGHTON, AS INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

Citator

Cited By

• King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)
  …Act of January 28, 1915, c. 22, 38 Stat. 803. ' - " Since the effective date of the Act of -1925,.judgments of state courts sustaining the validity of municipal ordinances have been reviewed on writ of error in a number of cases. Beery v. Houghton, 273 U. S. 671 (Per Curiam); Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. Deckebach, 274 U. S. 392; Angelo v. Winston-Salem, 274 U. S. 725 (Per Curiam); Bloecher & Schaaf v. Baltimore, 275 U. S. 490 (Per Curiam); Kresge Co. v. Dayton, 275 U. S. 505 (Per Curiam). Compare Natchez v. Mc…
• City OF ST. Paul v. Chicago, 413 F.2d 762 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …andard Oil Co. v. Marysville, 279 U.S. 582, 49 S.Ct. 430, 73 L.Ed. 856 (1929); Kiges v. City of St. Paul, 240 Minn. 522, 62 N.W. 2d 363, 369-370 (1953); State ex rel. Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 204 N.W. 569, 54 A.L.R. 1012 (1925), aff’d mem., 273 U.S. 671, 47 S.Ct. 474, 71 L.Ed. 832 (1927).9 The test of whether the enact [*767] ment falls within that power is one of reasonableness. The zoning ordinance will be sustained unless its “ * * * provisions are clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, having no…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Koch v. City OF Toledo, 37 F.2d 336 (6th Cir. 1930)
  …g residential districts from whieh business and trade, hotels and apartment houses, are excluded. Any doubt of the power of the city to exclude apartment houses from such districts that remained after that decision was renloved by Beery v. Houghton, 273 U. S. 671, 47 S. Ct. 474, 71 L. Ed. 832, affirming State v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 204 N. W. 569, 54 A. L. R. 1012. In passing upon ordinances of this kind, the courts have been unwilling to substitute- their judgment for that of the legislative body char…

Authorities Cited

• Vill. OF Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1926)