AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY AND CLINTON H. MCKAY

v.

JACOB KRIGER

Citator

Cited By

• King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)
  …, the validity of the underlying statute as well as of the order was attacked: Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Commission, 271 U. S. 583; Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 272 U. S. 605; Miller Lumber Co. v. Floyd, 273 U. S. 672 (Per Curiam); Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission, 274 U. S. 651; Pierce v. Barker, 274 U. S. 718 (Per Curiam); Stimson Lumber Co. v. Kuykendall, 275 U. S. 207; International Great Northern R. R. Co. v. Railroad Commission, 275 U. S. 503 (Pe…
• Am. Wood Prods. Co. v. City OF Minneapolis, 35 F.2d 657 (8th Cir. 1929)
  …. It may be noted in passing that this very ordinance has been held valid by the Supreme Court of Minnesota in Beery v. Houghton, 164 Minn. 146, 204 N. W. 569, 54 A. L. R. 1012, which decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States. 273 U. S. 672, 47 S. Ct. 474, 71 L. Ed. 832. It should be said that the decision related only to the general constitutionality of the ordinance, and that it had no reference to its effect as to particular properties. The Supreme Court of Minnesota, however, said…

Authorities Cited

• Barrett v. Van Pelt, 268 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1925)
• Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co., 269 U.S. 158 (U.S. 1925)