UNITED STATES
v.
LEIB RITTERMAN

U.S. | 1926-11-23
No. 669
273 U.S. 685 Supreme Court of the United States (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kercheval v. United States, 274 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1927)
    …lty. Under the evidence in this case a plea of guilty upon his part would have seemed a very reasonable .thing. We see no substantial or prejudicial error in the admission of any of [*223] the evidence complained of.” The case is here on certiorari. 273 U. S. 685. In support of the rulings below, the United States cites Commonwealth v. Ervine, 8 Dana (Ky.) 30; People v. Jacobs, 165 App. Div. 721; State v. Carta, 90 Conn. 79; People v. Boyd, 67 Cal. App. 292, 302; and People v. Steinmetz, 240 N. Y. 411. The…
  • Delaware v. Rellstab, 276 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1928)
    …thereupon applied to the Circuit Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus to reinstate the judgment, but the Circuit Court of Appeals held that it had no jurisdiction to grant the writ, 15 F. (2d) 137. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court. 273 U. S. 685. However strong may have been the convictions of the District Judge that injustice would be done by enforcing the judgment, he could not set it aside on the ground that the testimony of admitted perjurers was perjured also at [*5] the second trial.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw