ARTHUR H. LAMBORN, GERARD P. TAMELING, CHARLES C. RIGGS, ET AL

v.

NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By

• Toledo v. Allen, 276 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1928)
  …rdict and judgment for plaintiff. The defendant, alleging numerous grounds, moved for a new trial. It was deni¿d. The case was [*168] taken to the Supreme Court where the judgment was affirmed. 292 S. W. 730. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. 273 U. S. 688. The yard where plaintiff was injured included a lead track and, connected with it, a number of parallel switch tracks, the centers of which were about 12 feet apart. Plaintiff had been regularly employed there as car checker for about 18 months, a…
• Larson v. WM. Wrigley, JR., 277 U.S. 97 (U.S. 1928)
• Lamborn v. The Nat'l Bank of Commerce of Norfolk, 276 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1928)
  …d trial, the presiding [*472] judge, applying the rule declared by the appellate court, directed a verdict for the defendant. The judgment entered thereon was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 15 F. (2d) 473. This Court granted a writ of certiorari, 273 U. S. 688, because of conflict with cases decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Matthew Smith Tea, Coffee & Grocery Co. v. Lamborn (and other cases), 276 Fed. 325, 10 F. (2d) 697, certiorari denied, 271 U. S. 683, 685, 686. The defe…