KATHERINE LINSTEAD, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN A. LINSTEAD, DECEASED,

v.

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co., 276 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1928)
  …ny and the respondent. The district court entered a decree in favor of respondent. The railroad company declining to join, petitioner alone appealed. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, 15 F. (2d) 509, and this Court granted a writ of certiorari. 273 U. S. 690. Respondent is a Tennessee corporation carrying on a transfer business at Bowling Green, Kentucky. The petitioner is a Kentucky corporation in competition with respondent. The railroad company is a Kentucky corporation. In 1925, it made a contract…
• Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 276 U.S. 28 (U.S. 1928)
  …ish the facts of this case from those of Hull v. Philadelphia, etc., Ry., 252 U. S. 475, — an opinion which apparently was not brought to the attention of the trial court.” The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals was brought here by certiorari. 273 U. S. 690. The legal consequences of the relation between one in the general service of another who is in the special service of a third person are set forth in the case of the Standard Oil Company v. Anderson, 212 U. S. 215, 221. In that case the plaintiff…
• McGUIRE v. Sherwin-Willliams Co., 87 F.2d 112 (7th Cir. 1936)
  …s most all questions of general jurisprudence not dependent upon the construction of a state statute or the enforcement of a property right peculiar to the state. Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Company v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Company, 273 U.S. 690, 47 S.Ct. 472, 71 L.Ed. 842; Salem Trust Company v. Manufacturers’ Finance Company et al., 264 U.S. 182, 44 S.Ct. 266, 68 L.Ed. 628, 31 A.L.R. 867; Boyce v. Tabb, 18 Wall. (85 U.S.) 546, 21 L.Ed. 757. On the other hand, while it is recognized that…