FRANK C. HART

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ernie M. Duff v. The Kan. City Star Co., 299 F.2d 320 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …e of a once-published newspaper.2 The name of a newspaper at best, if it qualifies as being unique and original, can- be trademarked. [*324] 3 As stated in Pulitzer Pub. Co. v. Houston Printing Co., 5 Cir., 1926, 11 F. 2d 834, 836, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 694, 47 S.Ct. 91, 71 L.Ed. 844, being concerned with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch trying to prevent the Houston Post-Dispatch from using the name “Post-Dispatch”: “ * * * was settled long prior to the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905 * * * that one i…
• E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co., 136 F.2d 512 (6th Cir. 1943)
  …good will; Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Champion, D.C. Mich., 23 F.Supp. 638, and it is the good will and not the mark, that is protected. Pulitzer Pub. Co. v. Houston Printing Co., D.C., 4 F. 2d 924, affirmed 5 Cir., 11 F. 2d 834, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 694, 47 S.Ct. 91, 71 L.Ed. 844. This case is concerned with the question whether Prichard ever established, by user, the right to the trade-mark, as well as whether a license to others to use the mark, was valid. It may be observed that a trade-mark is…
• Forrest Silva Tucker v. United States, 251 F.2d 794 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …e instrument for any purpose.” In footnote 7 to our Collins opinion, Judge Stephens cites (among other apposite cases) two criminal cases from this Circuit, Wells v. United States, 257 F. 605; Hart v. United States, 11 F. 2d 499, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 694, 47 S.Ct. 92, 71 L.Ed. 844, supporting the doctrine that “In the federal courts no error can be predicated on the admission of evidence unless the objection thereto is specific.” The challenge to the authority of the Director of the Bureau of Priso…