ALEXANDER ACKERSON
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1926-10-18
No. 622
273 U.S. 702 Supreme Court of the United States (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Markis, 352 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1965)
    …cation of Markis’ voice as that on the receiving end. It is plain that Ripa could not be allowed to testify as to what Mentó said the receiver said; Mentó alone could do that. See Van Riper v. United States, 13 F. 2d 961, 968 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 702, 47 S.Ct. 102, 71 L.Ed. 848 (1926); United States v. Benjamin, 328 F. 2d 854, 861 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 953, 84 S. Ct. 1631, 12 L.Ed.2d 497 (1964). But Mento’s dialing of 336-0254 and his [*864] placing of bets, including language used…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw