JAMES THOMPSON AND THE J. L. HUDSON COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS, ETC., ET AL.

v.

VOGUE COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Ragland, 375 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …econd case also testified in the earlier one. Casias v. United States, supra at 615; Harbold v. United States, supra at 205; Cwach v. United States, 212 F. 2d 520, 529 (8 Cir. 1954); Belvin v. United States, 12 F. 2d 548, 550 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 706, 47 S.Ct. 98, 71 L.Ed. 850 (1926); Wilkes v. United States, 291 F. 988, 990 (6 Cir. 1923), cert. denied, 263 U.S. 719, 44 S.Ct. 181, 68 L.Ed. 523 (1924); Haussener v. United States, 4 F. 2d 884, 886 (8 Cir. 1925); cf. United States v. Cooper, 332 F.…
• Triangle Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rohrlich, 167 F.2d 969 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …n which the defendants rely are Durable Toy & Novelty Corp. v. J. Chein & Co., 2 Cir., 133 F. 2d 853, and Vogue Co. v. Thompson-Hudson Co., 6 Cir., 300 F. 509; Vogue Co. v. Vogue Hat Co., 6 Cir., 6 F. 2d 875, certiorari denied Thompson v. Vogue Co., 273 U.S. 706, 47 S.Ct. 98, 71 L.Ed. 850. In the first case we declined to enjoin the use of the name ■“Uncle Sam” in connection with toy banks. In weighing the conflicting interests there, it was thought that “Uncle Sam” represented a common name or symbol of na…
• United States v. Zettie Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …als of different defendants who are tried upon charges which are similar but which arise out of separate and distinct transactions. See Ramos v. United States, 12 F. 2d 761 (1 Cir. 1926); Belvin v. United States, 12 F. 2d 548 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 706, 47 S.Ct. 98, 71 L.Ed. 850 (1926); and state-court cases cited in Annotation, 160 A.L.R. 753, 762-766 (1946). Moreover, the federal courts have uniformly held that prejudice must [*985] be proved, not merely implied, in cases indistinguishable from…