SUBMARINE SIGNAL COMPANY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Weiner, 578 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …owingly suppressed one fact permitted, although it surely did not compel, an inference that their suppression of another was likewise knowing and willful.” 425 F. 2d at 809, quoting Bentel v. United States, 13 F. 2d 327, 329 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 713, 47 S.Ct. 109, 71 L.Ed. 854 (1926). In view of the defendants’ duty because of their roles as auditors and financial officer of the company, the jury instruction was proper. Q. JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON UNANIMITY Lichtig, joined by Block and Weiner, co…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Frank, 388 F.2d 486 (2d Cir. 1968)
• United States v. Ross, 321 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …g a statement he had no intention of carrying out. All these alleged misrepresentations were plainly frauds within statutes antedating § 17(a) (2), see Bentel v. United States, 13 F. 2d 327, 329 (2 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Amos v. United States, 273 U.S. 713, 47 S.Ct. 109, 71 L.Ed. 854 (1926); Van Riper v. United States, 13 F. 2d 961, 964-965 (2 Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Ackerson v. United States, 273 U.S. 702, 47 S.Ct. 102, 71 L.Ed. 848 (1926); and within that section also, 3 Loss, Securities Regula…