L. J. (BEAR CAT) RIGGS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Markovich, 348 F.2d 238 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …erequisite, Kirsch v. United States, 173 F. 2d 652, 654 (8 Cir. 1949); Neely v. United States, 151 F. 2d 533 (5 Cir. 1945); Jianole v. United States, 58 F. 2d 115, 117-118 (8 Cir. 1932); Riggs v. United States, 14 F. 2d 5, 10 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 719, 47 S.Ct. 110, 71 L.Ed. 857 (1926). Moreover, if a criminal prosecution has been started based upon probationer’s conduct the probation court need not await conclusion of those proceedings, United States ex rel. MacLaren v. Denno, 173 F.Supp. 237, 2…
• Jianole v. United States, 58 F.2d 115 (8th Cir. 1932)
  …fully recognized, much greater caution will have to be exercised in extending this grace originally, and the benefits of the act will become greatly restricted.” And finally in Riggs v. United States (C. C. A. 4) 14 F.(2d) 5, 12 (certiorari denied 273 U. S. 719, 47 S. Ct. 110, 71 L. Ed. 857) Judge McDowell, speaking to the point here under consideration, in a concurring opinion, said: “The purpose of the Probation Act is to put a selected part of those who, lacking self-control, have violated the law, und…
• Kelly v. United States ex rel. Frad, 89 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1937)
  …mpowered to sign and enter orders in a case pending in such other district when absent therefrom and in his own district. Cf. Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490, 55 S.Ct. 818, 79 L.Ed. 1566; Riggs v. United States, 14F.(2d) 5 (C.C.A.4), certiorari denied 273 U.S. 719, 47 S.Ct. 110, 71 L.Ed. 857. The order of the sentencing judge purporting to terminate the appellee’s probation was void because of lack of jurisdiction. When he entertained the application and decided it, he was not sitting at that time as a judge…