FEDERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

MRS. JENNIE M. RASCOE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Groves, 122 F.2d 87 (2d Cir. 1941)
  …ntly held to be within the contemplation of the mail fraud statute. United States v. Buckner, 2 Cir., 108 F. 2d 921, certiorari denied 309 U.S. 669, 60 S.Ct. 613, 84 L.Ed. 1016. See Campbell v. United States, 9 Cir., 12 F. 2d 873, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 722, 47 S.Ct. 112, 71 L.Ed. 859. Appellants’ contrary argument — that so to interpret the Buckner case would make application of the statute more extensive than the common-law action for deceit — must fail for two reasons. First, the statute is not li…
• Merrick v. Allstate Ins. Co., 349 F.2d 279 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …paration” (whereas the payment of punitive damages in settlement of the third lawsuit here is an admission of willful and material breach). The dissenting opinion in Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Rascoe, 12 F. 2d 693, 697-698 (6 Cir. 1926), cert. denied 273 U.S. 722, 47 S.Ct. 112, 71 L.Ed. 859, referred to with approval by the Kansas City Court of Appeals in Allen v. National Life & Acc. Ins. Co., supra, p. 536 of 67 S.W. 2d, and Restatement, Contracts, § 318, as revised in its 1948 Supplement, are also cited a…