EMLENTON REFINING COMPANY

v.

WALTER A. CHAMBERS, TRADING AS G. L. P. CHAMBERS AND COMPANY, TO THE USE OF JAMES A. ADAMS, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Amalgamated Ass'n of St. v. Dixie Motor Coach Corp., 170 F.2d 902 (8th Cir. 1948)
  …S. 350, 60 S.Ct. 569, 84 L.Ed. 799; Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers Union of America, 4 Cir., 167 F. 2d 183; Donnelly Garment Co. v. Dubinsky, 8 Cir., 154 F. 2d 38; Emlenton Refining Co. v. Chambers, 3 Cir., 14 F. 2d 104, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 731, 47 S.Ct. 240, 71 L.Ed. 863; I. L. U. v. [*908] Sunset Line & Twine Co., D.C.Cal., 77 F.Supp. 119; Gerry v. Superior Court, Cal. Sup., 194 P. 2d 689. As we are convinced that the district court was without power to grant the decree of injunction ap…
• Bronx Fire Ins. Co. v. Wasson, 62 F.2d 556 (10th Cir. 1932)
  …rders. Hunt v. United States (C. C. A. 10) 53 F.(2d) 333; Satterlee v. Harris (C. C. A. 10) 60 F.(2d) 490; Cox v. Graves, Knight & Graves (C. C. A. 4) 55 F.(2d) 217; Emlenton Eefining Co. v. Chambers (C. C. A. 3) 14 F.(2d) 104, certiorari denied 273 U. S. 731, 47 S. Ct. 240, 71 L. Ed. 863. Decisions of state courts, under state statutes, are therefore not pertinent. If it were otherwise, the case must still be reversed because of the refusal of the trial court to permit the appellant to show, on the tri…