C. G. CATE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n (D.D.C. 1952)
  …F. 2d 883, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 560, 55 S.Ct. 72, 79 L.Ed. 661. See, also, Raymond City Coal & Transportation Corp. v. New York Cent. R. Co., 6 Cir., 103 F. 2d 56, 57; Southern Pacific Co. v. Loth-rop, 9 Cir., 15 F. 2d 486, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 742, 47 S.Ct. 336, 71 L.Ed. 869. . “Export rates will also apply on shipments consigned on bills of lading for ex [*967] port, destined to foreign countries or foreign possessions of the United States, handled through United States Navy Yards, Naval Ba…
• Burrus Mill & Elevator Co. of Okla. v. Chicago, 131 F.2d 532 (10th Cir. 1942)
  …aced upon them as throwing light upon the question of ambiguity. Substantial ambiguities or expressions of doubtful meaning in tariffs are to be resolved in favor of the shipper. Southern Pac. Co. v. Lothrop, 9 Cir., 15 F. 2d 486, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 742, 47 S.Ct. 336, 71 L.Ed. 869; Updike Grain Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 35 F. 2d 486; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Atlantic Bridge Co., 5 Cir., 57 F. 2d 654; Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 66 F. 2d 96…
• Ellis v. Associated Indus. Ins. Corp., 24 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1928)
  …territorial jurisdiction, and that court was fully competent to render judgment in the premises, as diversity of citizenship and the necessary jurisdictional amount are shown. Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Ware (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 171; Certiorari denied, 273 U. S. 742, 47 S. Ct. 335, 71 L. Ed. 869; United Dredging Co. v. Lindberg (C. C. A.) 18 F.(2d) 453; Railway Co. v. Whitton’s Administrator, 13 Wall. 270, 20 L. Ed. 571. [2] The Texas Workmen’s Compensation Law defines an employee as follows: “‘Employe’ shall…