ROBERT B. HUDSON, A JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

v.

VERNON V. HARRIS, AS RECEIVER OF THE RIVERSIDE OIL AND REFINING COMPANY, J. B. DUDLEY, AND J. D. LYDICK

Citator

Cited By

• Levin Bros. v. Davis MFG. Co., 72 F.2d 163 (8th Cir. 1934)
  …nuous Glass Press Co. v. Schmertz Wire Glass Co., 219 F. 199 (C. C. A. 3); Superior Mach. Tool Co. v. Cinn. Lathe & Tool Co., 284 F. 267 (C. C. A. 6); Peter Schoenhofen Brewing Co. v. Alvey-Ferguson Co., 14 F.(2d) 945 (C. C. A. 7), certiorari denied 273 U. S. 743, 47 S. Ct. 336, 71 L. Ed. 869; Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co., 30 F.(2d) 281, (C. C. A. 7).…
• Schell v. Ford Motor Co., 270 F.2d 384 (1st Cir. 1959)
  …ledge of the declarant.” Therefore the attorney may testify as to what the intestate had told him as to the latter’s state of mind when signing the waiver. See American Railway Express Co. v. Rowe, 1 Cir., 1926, 14 F. 2d 269, certiorari denied 1927, 273 U.S. 743, 47 S.Ct. 336, 71 L.Ed. 869. Of course, the court must make the required findings as stated in the Massachusetts statute. The district court did not on this motion for summary judgment purport to rule adversely on the admissibility of the attorney…