BUCKEYE TRACTION DITCHER COMPANY

v.

AUSTIN MACHINERY COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litig. Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp., 498 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ry judgment. Croley v. Matson Navigation Co., 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F. 2d 73. See also Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper Co., 6 Cir. 1974, 491 F. 2d 1193; Austin Machinery Co. v. Buckeye Traction Ditcher Co., 6 Cir. 1926, 13 F. 2d 697, cert. denied, 1927, 273 U.S. 747, 47 S.Ct. 448, 71 L.Ed. 871 (reversing a judgment of patent invalidity for prior public use or sale on the ground that the district court drew the wrong inferences from the established facts); Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc. v. Ardac, Inc., 9 Cir. 1…
• Ajem Labs., Inc. v. C. M. Ladd Co., Inc., 424 F.2d 1124 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …shop tests at the Centri-Spray plant. They also fully justify his rejection of appellants’ arguments that this machine was “experimental” within the rule of Austin Machinery Co. v. Buckeye Traction Ditcher Co., 13 F. 2d 697 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 747, 47 S.Ct. 448, 71 L.Ed. 871 (1926). On this record we certainly cannot say that any of the findings of fact of the District Court on the Section 102(b) issue are “clearly erroneous.” Fed.R.Civ. P. 52(a). Much of appellants’ argument, however, appe…
• Est. of Gregg Maxcy v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 441 F.2d 192 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …5th Cir. 1948); Coffey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 141 F. 2d 204 (5th Cir. 1944); Marshall v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 57 F. 2d 633 (6th Cir. 1932); Southern Industrial Institute v. Marsh, 15 F. 2d 347 (5th Cir. 1926), cert. denied 273 U.S. 747, 47 S.Ct. 449, 71 L.Ed. 872. In Coffey, supra, this court affirmed the decision of the Tax Court in a Florida case, 1 T.C. 579 (1943), wherein the Tax Court stated at page 586: The mere transfer of shares to the name of a donee on the company’s bo…