FRANK WEEKE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Antoine v. United States, 637 F.2d 1177 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …e United States should be ordered to grant a substitute allotment to Antoine. In any event, we note that equitable relief such as specific performance may be barred by laches. See Lemieux v. United States, 15 F. 2d 518 (8th Cir. 1926), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 749, 47 S.Ct. 458, 71 L.Ed. 872 (1927). The order of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to give the United States an opportunity to prove that Wicatanynaun or his heirs forfeited their allotted land by failing to cult…
• Finch v. United States & Stewart Udall, 387 F.2d 13 (10th Cir. 1967)
  …ticular lands to a particular Indian upon selection. Approval of his selection and location never was and is not now a mere ministerial duty of the Secretary. Wise v. United States, supra; Lemieux v. United States, 8 Cir., 15 F. 2d 518, cert. denied 273 U.S. 749, 47 S.Ct. 458, 71 L.Ed. 872. The appellants assert that the lands in question have great potential as oil-producing lands. We consider this to be irrelevant. The question of value relates to agricultural value in keeping with the intent of the Allo…
• Wise v. The United States, 297 F.2d 822 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …and on the reservation in appellant, or anyone else in a similar situation, all of the preliminary administrative procedures heretofore fully discussed would have to be complied with. Lemieux v. United States (CCA 8, 1926), 15 F. 2d 518, cert. den., 273 U.S. 749, 47 S.Ct. 458, 71 L.Ed. 872; Woodbury v. United States (CCA 8, 1909), 170 F. 302, 95 CCA 498; United States v. Reynolds (1919), 250 U.S. 104, 39 S.Ct. 409, 63 L.Ed. 873; LaRoque v. United States, 239 U.S. 62, 36 S.Ct. 22 (supra). That has not been d…