HONTO H. TOOLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF ESTATE OF WLLLIAM L. TOOLEY, DECEASED,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
HONTO H. TOOLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF ESTATE OF WLLLIAM L. TOOLEY, DECEASED,
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
273 U.S. 755
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heisler v. United States, 394 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1968)…loniously and” or “and feloniously” in two counts, as surplusage. This was done by actually drawing a line through the words, the change being initialled by all counsel. (See Stewart v. District Court, etc., 9 Cir., 1926, 16 F. 2d 863, cert. denied, 273 U.S. 755, 47 S.Ct. 457, 71 L.Ed. 875.) On the authority of Bain, the judgment was reversed. In Carney v. United States, 9 Cir., 1947, 163 F. 2d 784, 788-790, cert. denied, 332 U.S. 824, 68 S.Ct. 165, 92 L.Ed. 400, the defendant was charged in one count with…
-
United States v. Cirami, 510 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1975)…to evade corporate taxes. The improper reference to the amount of taxes does not warrant reversal. . The manner of altering the face of the indictment in Stewart is explained in Stewart v. District Court, 16 F. 2d 863 (9th Cir. 1926), cert. denied, 273 U.S. 755, 47 S.Ct. 457, 71 L.Ed. 875 (1927).…