FRANK W. KEELER

v.

STANLEY MYERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ETC., AND THOMAS M. HURLBURT, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gen. Motors Corp., 121 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1941)
  …ted States v. United Shoe Mach. Co., 247 U.S. 32, 38 S.Ct. 473, 62 L.Ed. 968; United States v. General Electric, 272 U.S. 476, 47 S.Ct. 192, 71 L.Ed. 362; Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 4 Cir., 15 F. 2d 678, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 757, 47 S.Ct. 459, 71 L.Ed. 876; and Arthur v. Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp., D.C., 26 F.Supp. 824. This reasoning fails mainly because it assumes that the General Motors dealer is an agent of the manufacturer or, stated differently, because it considers t…
• Burnham Chem. Co. v. Borax Consolidated, 170 F.2d 569 (9th Cir. 1948)
  …resent substantially the same contentions and are considered as one brief. Nalle v. Oyster, 1913, 230 U.S. 165, 33 S.Ct. 1043, 57 L.Ed. 1439; Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation, 4 Cir., 1926, 15 F. 2d 678, certiorari denied 273 U.S. 757, 47 S.Ct. 459, 71 L.Ed. 876; Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co., 4 Cir., 1934, 72 F. 2d 885; Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co., 9 Cir., 1936, 85 F. 2d 742, certiorari denied 299 U.S. 613, 57 S.Ct. 315, 81 L.Ed. 452. See also Hicks v. B…
• Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co., 72 F.2d 885 (4th Cir. 1934)
  …ivhieh the court can determine that there has been a violation of the Act with resultant damage proximately caused thereby to the plaintiff. In Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. (C. C. A. 4) 15 F.(2d) 678, 680 (certiorari denied, 273 U. S. 757, 47 S. Ct. 459, 71 L. Ed. 876) this Court, by Judge Parker, said: “For it is not sufficient that the declaration be framed in the words of the statute, or that it allege mere conclusions of the pleader. It must describe with definiteness and certai…